top of page
Cover BECS.png

BECS

Empowering Business Growth

Project in Short

Client

PacketFront Software I BTB

Project Type

Redesign of a telecom network management system

Duration

November 2024 – Mars 2025

Team Setup

Product Owner

Senior Product & Service Designer

Solution Architect

Developers

Tools

Figma

Languages Used

Swedish & English

Platform Focus

Prioritized desktop interface due to time constraints and user context. 

The Need

​BECS was a legacy network management system, critical to PacketFront’s operations and its customer base. The interface was outdated, inconsistent, and difficult to use, which caused operational inefficiencies, high onboarding time, and a reliance on manuals and external support.

Key challenges​

  • High cognitive load and complex navigation

  • Inefficient workflows disconnected from users’ mental models

  • A rigid tree navigation tied to legacy functions, limiting scalability

  • No scalable design system, increasing maintenance costs

  • Business stakeholders (CTOs) demanded automation for cost efficiency, while end users (network engineers) felt threatened by it

  • Non-compliance with WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility standards

My Role & Responsibilities

​As the Senior Product Designer, I led the UX and UI workstreams and was responsible for delivering a scalable, user-centered design solution aligned with PacketFront’s product and business strategy.

  • Analyze user needs and business goals

  • Lead discovery, synthesis, and UX strategy

  • Facilitate stakeholder and user workshops

  • Design workflows and interaction models

  • Create a modular design system for scalability

  • Ensure accessibility (WCAG 2.1 AA compliance)

  • Conduct usability testing and iterate prototypes

  • Collaborate with development for smooth implementation

  • Drive cross-functional communication with marketing, sales, and product

Impact & Results

  • 40% reduction in onboarding time

  • 0% reliance on manuals during usability tests

  • Increased user confidence and trust

Business Impact

  • Reduced friction in sales and evaluation phases

  • Clearer product positioning improved adoption

  • Faster future development with scalable component library

  • Reduced dependency on PacketFront support teams post-sale

  • Increased customer satisfaction, lowered churn risk

Process & Methods

I applied a user-centered, agile design process, structured around discovery, ideation, prototyping, validation, and delivery.

Discovery / Define

The goal was to understand user needs, map current pain points, and align the team on product vision and priorities.

Methods

Stakeholder Interviews / Product Vision Workshops

User Interviews (Tech sales, Network Operators, Product Managers)

UX Audit (Heuristic evaluation of the legacy system)

Customer Journey Mapping

Jobs-To-Be-Done Analysis

Value Proposition Canvas

Impact Mapping (to align goals, users, actions, deliverables)

Scalability Planning (for future modular packaging)

Card Sorting (for information architecture)

Outcome

We identified three core functional areas that were critical for users to efficiently manage their daily operations: Inventory Management, Firmware Upgrades, and Troubleshooting.

​

These areas were initially prioritized by the client for modular packaging and sales opportunities. However, through user research, Jobs-To-Be-Done analysis, and customer journey mapping, it became clear that separating these functions into individual, purchasable modules would create friction and frustration for users.

​

Users needed seamless access to all three functionalities in order to complete their core daily tasks without unnecessary interruptions or additional purchases. By splitting these into separate modules, we risked compromising the user experience and reducing the system’s overall efficiency and value.

Strategic Recommendation

All three functional areas were repositioned as part of the "core offering", ensuring that essential workflows were fully supported out-of-the-box. Additional features and advanced modules could then be added on top, based on each customer’s specific needs and business context.

Segmentation for Scalable Modularization

During the discovery phase, it became clear that the redesign was not just about modernizing the interface. One of the most important strategic insights was the need to identify a common denominator across different user groups. By analyzing user needs through Jobs-To-Be-Done frameworks and user journey mapping, we uncovered that different user roles had distinct day-to-day workflows, yet they shared a core set of functionalities critical to their daily operations.

​

This insight led to a new approach in segmenting the user base, which became essential for scaling the product through modular offerings. Rather than segmenting based on traditional customer tiers or company size, we focused on segmenting by user goals and operational tasks. As a result, the core product offering was defined to include the essential modules (Inventory Management, Firmware Upgrades, and Troubleshooting), while additional features could be packaged and scaled according to specific organizational needs.

Cross-functional Insights & Alignment

We also discovered a critical gap between two key customer stakeholder groups

​

  • Business Stakeholders (Buyers/CTOs): Focused on cost-saving and scalability, motivated by automation to reduce staffing and onboard more customers.

  • Network Engineers (End Users): Responsible for evaluating the product’s usability, skeptical about automation due to concerns over job security and fear of losing control of network operations.

​​​

Additionally, PacketFront’s existing implementation process required extensive support, often a month-long effort post-sale, which further eroded user trust in the system’s ease of use.

​

I led cross-functional workshops with Sales, Marketing, and Product teams to address these conflicting perspectives and align messaging and product positioning. The insight led to a refined communication strategy emphasizing empowerment and control rather than automation replacing human expertise.

Before The Redesign of BECS - Telecom Management System 
Skärmavbild 2025-03-19 kl. 11.05.31.png
Discovery of how bad the system's Accessibility was
Skärmavbild 2025-03-19 kl. 11.07.22.png
Presentation of WHY the modular business model needs to improve
Skärmavbild 2025-03-19 kl. 11.06.13.png
Presentation of who we should prioritize

Ideate / Prototype

The goal was to generate solutions, design workflows, and create prototypes for user testing.

Methods

Brainstorming & Brainwriting workshops

Task Flows & Interaction Mapping

Wireframing & Low-fi Prototypes

UX Writing refinement and language standardization

Prototyping in Figma

Outcome

During ideation and prototyping, we uncovered hardcoded architecture dependencies that made fundamental changes to the tree navigation structure impossible without alienating existing users. The operation table functions were tightly bound to this navigation, posing a major migration challenge.

​

We focused on

  • Labeling improvements and clarified navigation terms, using industry-standard language rather than internal jargon

  • Progressive disclosure patterns to reduce cognitive overload in legacy structures

  • Multiple sketching rounds and prototypes, balancing legacy familiarity with modern UX best practices

Workshop shetching
Structure
Skärmavbild 2025-03-19 kl. 11.48.57.png
Workshops and Low-fidelity Sketching with my team
Typography_edited.jpg
Colors.png
Grid and Indention.png
The start of a library in Figma
Cards.png
Navigations.png
Important components in the design library

Validation / Delivery

Usability Testing with both legacy customers and potential new users

Task Success Rate Measurement

WCAG 2.1 AA Accessibility 

Component Library Delivery in Figma

Developer Handoff and Implementation Guidelines

Design System Foundations & Cross-functional Workshops

Early in the design system process, we aligned branding and technical feasibility. Marketing had established a font, but it needed validation for SaaS use across Europe and the US.

​​​

  • Primary font readability and fallback font strategy

  • Cross-browser support: Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge

  • Grid & Layout system optimized for desktop, with future tablet/mobile scalability

  • WCAG 2.1 AA compliant color palettes for accessibility

  • Accessibility considerations: visual impairments, ADHD, cognitive challenges

Key Design Decisions

Desktop-first focus due to NOC environments

Unified Core Functionality Offering: Inventory, Firmware, Troubleshooting

Segmentation by Jobs-To-Be-Done for modular product strategy

Modular Design System with scalable components

Progressive Disclosure to ease cognitive load

Accessibility (WCAG 2.1 AA)

Terminology standardization and UX Writing refinement

Communication Strategy: reframing automation as empowering engineers

Migration planning balancing legacy familiarity with scalable modern UX

People aren’t only made of logic and action, they are also full of
feelings, intuition, emotions and memories. That’s what to keep
in mind when designing products. 

​

light-1.png
light-2.png
light.png
light-3.png
light-5.png

Measured User Testing Outcomes

Impact & Results

  • 40% reduction in onboarding time

  • 0% reliance on manuals during usability tests

  • Increased user confidence and trust

Business Impact

  • Reduced friction in sales and evaluation phases

  • Clearer product positioning improved adoption

  • Faster future development with scalable component library

  • Reduced dependency on PacketFront support teams post-sale

  • Increased customer satisfaction, lowered churn risk

Recommendations to PacketFront

To ensure continued success and scalability of the BECS platform, I strongly recommend maintaining clear design governance as the system evolves. Regular usability validation should be an integral part of future iterations to verify that design decisions continue to align with user needs and business goals.

Additionally, it’s crucial to establish a structured migration strategy for existing customers. While I delivered the foundation for this plan—including user workflows, interaction patterns, and a scalable modular approachthe actual migration will require careful execution to avoid disrupting current operations.

I also recommend hiring a dedicated product designer who can take ownership of the design system, continue to refine the migration plan, and collaborate closely with product and development teams to ensure consistent, user-centered design across future releases.

Reflection & Learnings

Redesigning BECS was a complex and rewarding challenge that reinforced the importance of early alignment between design, technology, and marketing. Working within the constraints of a legacy system meant balancing the need for modern usability with the reality of deeply ingrained workflows and technical dependencies.

​

One of the key learnings was the necessity of a well-planned migration strategy that respects existing users' workflows while introducing improvements that increase efficiency and clarity. By focusing on scalable design solutions and delivering a clear migration framework, we laid the groundwork for a seamless future transition.

​

The project also demonstrated how cross-functional collaboration—especially between product, development, sales, and marketing—ensures a holistic approach to solving user and business challenges. Acting as a design lead in this environment emphasized the critical role of design leadership in bridging the gap between strategy and execution.

Thanks for your time!

bottom of page